Private, practical Claude training for UK teams. Learn to use Projects, analyse long documents, check output quality and make safe decisions with business information.
Worked example
An illustrative workshop exercise using representative documents. The aim is to produce a comparison a colleague can check, rather than accept a confident summary at face value.
01
Give each document a clear label. Specify the criteria, required evidence and what should happen when the documents do not answer a question.
02
Ask for a row per criterion, a source reference for each finding and a separate field for missing or conflicting information.
03
Open the cited passages, check omissions and correct unsupported conclusions. Record the method in reusable team instructions.
You practise giving context, checking sources and deciding when a human needs to resolve uncertainty. The course teaches people to use Claude; it is not model training or a certification.
Read the business introduction to ClaudeClaude evidence exercise
Source A says “24 enquiries in April”. Source B says “30 enquiries in May”. A draft claims “The new campaign caused a 25% increase in enquiries.” Tick the checks that should happen before approval.
Your choices stay in this page. No sign-up required.
The percentage is 25%, but the word “caused” goes beyond these two sources. Select the causation check to challenge the draft.
Also confirm comparable definitions and reporting periods before approving the comparison.
Explore this route →Synthetic teaching example. Arithmetic alone cannot establish cause. Claude output still needs source and context checks; the exercise runs locally without an AI connection.
Claude becomes more useful when the team distinguishes repeatable extraction from judgement-heavy review. The workshop uses that distinction to choose exercises, context and review depth.
The matrix is an Indexify training framework, not a claim that every task should be delegated to Claude.
Choose a clear starting point. The final scope is confirmed after a short conversation about the participants, delivery location and workflows involved.
From £475 + VAT
A team that needs a practical, shared method for using Claude safely and consistently.
From £975 + VAT
Teams that want more time to practise on their roles, documents and recurring workflows.
From £1,795 + VAT
Organisations moving from individual experimentation to a governed, repeatable way of working.
Prices are starting points and exclude VAT. Travel, venue hire, specialist preparation, extra facilitation or larger cohorts are confirmed before booking.
Jon’s background spans software development, statistical analysis and marketing intelligence. His Claude work includes long-document comparison, evidence tables, research synthesis, report review and reusable Project instructions.
Jon works directly with the team to test Claude against the documents and decisions its people actually handle. The session makes source checking, uncertainty and professional sign-off visible rather than treating them as an afterthought.
Indexify publishes client claims only when the client has approved them and the evidence supports the result.
Read Jon’s full profileThe exact examples change by team, but the programme is grounded in the following practical areas.
Understand what Claude does well, where it can mislead and how account features affect the work you can do.
Give Claude the purpose, source material, constraints, output format and quality bar it needs to respond usefully.
Create a dependable workspace for recurring activity instead of rebuilding the context in every conversation.
Use Claude to navigate, compare and synthesise documents while keeping the source material visible and reviewable.
Apply source checks, review criteria and human sign-off before an answer reaches a client or decision-maker.
Agree what people can share, when to redact information, who owns the output and when a task should be escalated.
Preparation determines which exercises receive the most time. This outline makes the learning sequence clear before you book.
Map Claude to suitable work, clarify account constraints and establish what must not be shared.
Build a prompt from purpose, evidence, constraints, format and an explicit quality bar.
Set up recurring work with approved context and instructions the team can maintain.
A short pause before the applied document exercises.
Practise extracting evidence, comparing material and producing a structured work output.
Test the output, apply safe-use decisions and turn the strongest method into a team resource.
The session is designed for teams whose work depends on research, judgement, documents and clear communication, not a technical certification.
Break a question into research tasks, organise sources and distinguish evidence from interpretation.
Compare versions, proposals or submissions against explicit criteria and surface material differences.
Check a draft against the brief, locate unsupported claims and produce a focused revision list.
Turn approved notes and source material into a clear first draft that remains subject to professional review.
Convert a transcript or notes into owners, actions, dependencies and unanswered questions.
Create reusable context, output rules and a review checklist for work the team repeats.
The AI tool supports the process. It does not replace professional judgement, legal review or client sign-off.
We gather roles, current experience, account setup, approved tools and examples of repeated work.
We decide what can be used directly, what should be redacted and where representative material is safer.
The team learns through demonstrations and exercises selected for its work rather than a generic product tour.
We capture the reusable methods, unresolved questions and a practical 30-day adoption plan.
Read before you decide
A practical guide to use cases, Claude versus ChatGPT, account choice, data safety and team adoption.
Read the practical guideNeed ongoing learning rather than a private team engagement? Explore Jon’s AI Essentials learning pathway in a new tab.
A focused four-hour workshop starts at £475 plus VAT for up to 10 people. A six-hour applied workshop starts at £975 plus VAT. A two-day adoption programme starts at £1,795 plus VAT. Travel, venue hire, specialist preparation, extra facilitation and larger cohorts are confirmed before booking.
No. This is independent, practitioner-led training from Indexify. It focuses on using Claude effectively in business work and is not endorsed by or affiliated with Anthropic.
Not always. We agree the setup before the session. For features such as Projects, shared knowledge or enterprise controls, your organisation may need an appropriate Claude plan.
Yes, where your policy and account setup allow it. We can use redacted or representative material when confidentiality makes direct use inappropriate.
Yes. The session establishes a shared foundation before moving into practical workflows. We normally group participants with broadly similar needs so the exercises remain useful.
Yes. Ten people is the standard group size for hands-on participation. For larger cohorts we may recommend extra facilitation, multiple sessions or a briefing format, depending on the outcome you need.
No. This is practical business training rather than a technical qualification or Anthropic certification. The emphasis is on methods, exercises and reusable resources your team can apply at work.
Yes. Training is available online or onsite across the UK. London delivery can take place at your office in the City, Canary Wharf, Shoreditch or another suitable location.
Yes. The broader AI training programme compares tools and teaches transferable methods. This page is for teams that specifically want to adopt Claude well.
“Jon has provided excellent support for SEO strategy and implementation for Avicenna Pharmacies across England and Wales, driving impactful results for our brand awareness campaigns. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved top 5 rankings in a remarkably short time. Jon delivered a detailed, structured roadmap with clear tracking metrics, making progress transparent and actionable.”
“Our website had been facing some serious technical issues on WordPress and a noticeable drop in SEO rankings, and Jon was incredibly helpful in diagnosing and resolving these problems. He didn’t just fix the immediate problems; he also offered valuable advice on optimizing our site for better search engine visibility in the future.”
“Jon and the team were able to offer us clear, concise and accurate support and information during an integral business move when merging our company websites. The team are able to give strategic direction and reliable information at the drop of a hat! Incredibly responsive, could not recommend their services more.”
“Thanks to his expertise and unwavering dedication, we’ve catapulted to the first page of Google for our targeted keywords. What truly distinguishes Indexify is their exceptional customer service. Jon is incredibly responsive and attentive to our needs, ensuring that every question or concern is promptly addressed.”
Choose private online delivery or an onsite workshop built around your team, account setup and approved working material.
Inspect a synthetic report and see when missing or inconsistent evidence should stop release.
Explore this serviceCompare tools and build transferable AI working methods across the team.
Explore this serviceBuild practical ChatGPT workflows around Projects, files, data and safe adoption.
Explore this serviceSet proportionate policies, ownership and review controls around business AI use.
Explore this serviceTell us about the team, the workflow and what has prompted the conversation. We will recommend a proportionate first step.