Indexify helps teams automate recurring reporting: collecting approved inputs, reconciling metrics, preparing a useful draft and keeping human review at the point of release. Start with the report that keeps landing back on your desk.
Reporting capacity planner
Model the preparation you could remove, then put review and upkeep back in. Start with one recurring report.
Your choices stay in this page. No sign-up required.
14.4 preparation hours removed, less 4 hours of review and 2 hours of upkeep. Test this against several real reporting cycles before treating it as available capacity.
Measure the existing process, including corrections, before commissioning a build.
Explore this route →Illustrative scenario, not a forecast. Net capacity = reports × preparation hours × removal percentage − reports × review hours − upkeep. Review is additional to the baseline you enter. Negative results mean more work, not a saving.
Work directly with Jon to understand the process, define a useful first scope and connect the recommendations to practical delivery.
Bring a representative report or workflow. The first conversation establishes the problem, the available inputs and what needs to be tested before a wider commitment.
Read Jon’s full profileAgree a focused scope around the current process, the evidence it needs and the people who will run it.
A monthly pack, client update or management dashboard should answer a specific question. We identify its readers, the decisions they make and the figures they trust before choosing a format.
An automated report can repeat a mistake faster. We agree source definitions and access, check refresh dates, and decide how missing values, duplicates and changed fields should be handled.
Use repeatable rules for collection, calculations and formatting. Where AI-assisted commentary is useful, it works from the checked figures and must separate observations from hypotheses.
Late data and changed permissions happen. The workflow needs a clear hold state, an owner to notify and a way to produce the report manually while the problem is resolved.
Walk through the current source files, recipients and preparation steps. Measure a baseline that includes review and corrections.
Define inputs, outputs, release checks, access and exclusions. Confirm costs and ongoing ownership in a written scope.
Compare the same reporting period, reconcile discrepancies and test missing data before relying on the new workflow.
Review several cycles, document the routine and exceptions, train the owner and agree the support arrangement.
Read before you decide
Change a source condition and see why a useful reporting workflow sometimes refuses to release a result.
Read the practical guideNeed ongoing learning rather than a private team engagement? Explore Jon’s AI Essentials learning pathway in a new tab.
Start with an audit if you are not sure where AI fits, or go straight to a set-up for a workflow you already know.
From £3,000 one-off
plus VAT
From £1,500 one-off
plus VAT
From £350 a month
plus VAT
Larger programmes are scoped in writing before any work starts.
All prices exclude VAT. See every published price or see how AI set-ups work.
Reporting automation uses repeatable connections or imports, calculations and templates to prepare a recurring report. A dependable workflow also checks source freshness, definitions and completeness, and keeps a human approval step where needed.
We start by reviewing the current report, its sources and the decisions it supports. A spreadsheet, dashboard or document can be the output. Feasibility depends on access, source quality, calculations and the review required.
No. Collection, reconciliation, arithmetic and formatting often work best with ordinary automation. AI can help prepare explanatory text or organise material, but it should not replace validated calculations or evidence.
Most reporting set-ups start from £1,500 plus VAT, with optional support from £350 a month. The scope depends on the number of sources, their reliability, required transformations, output formats and support needs, so we confirm a written scope and fixed fee after reviewing a representative report. The calculator on this page estimates capacity, not fees.
The workflow should flag the issue and hold the affected output. We agree who investigates, what the manual fallback is and what evidence allows release. Missing information must not silently become a zero or a confident narrative.
“Jon has provided excellent support for SEO strategy and implementation for Avicenna Pharmacies across England and Wales, driving impactful results for our brand awareness campaigns. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved top 5 rankings in a remarkably short time. Jon delivered a detailed, structured roadmap with clear tracking metrics, making progress transparent and actionable.”
“Our website had been facing some serious technical issues on WordPress and a noticeable drop in SEO rankings, and Jon was incredibly helpful in diagnosing and resolving these problems. He didn’t just fix the immediate problems; he also offered valuable advice on optimizing our site for better search engine visibility in the future.”
“Jon and the team were able to offer us clear, concise and accurate support and information during an integral business move when merging our company websites. The team are able to give strategic direction and reliable information at the drop of a hat! Incredibly responsive, could not recommend their services more.”
“Thanks to his expertise and unwavering dedication, we’ve catapulted to the first page of Google for our targeted keywords. What truly distinguishes Indexify is their exceptional customer service. Jon is incredibly responsive and attentive to our needs, ensuring that every question or concern is promptly addressed.”
Tell us about the team, the workflow and what has prompted the conversation. We will recommend a proportionate first step.