Focused diagnosis
Best for
One known indexation, rendering or performance issue.
Typical output
Reproduction steps, cause, fix and acceptance criteria.
Find and fix the technical conditions that prevent important pages from being crawled, understood and surfaced. We protect established URLs while improving the foundations for Google Search, AI Overviews and answer engines.
The scope is agreed around the workflow, people, systems and evidence required. You do not need to commit to a large programme before a focused diagnostic or pilot has earned it.
Best for
One known indexation, rendering or performance issue.
Typical output
Reproduction steps, cause, fix and acceptance criteria.
Best for
A site with uncertain priorities or declining search performance.
Typical output
Prioritised findings by template, impact and implementation effort.
Best for
A redesign, replatform or domain change.
Typical output
Baseline, URL mapping, staging review and launch monitoring.
Best for
Teams shipping regular site changes.
Typical output
Release checks, issue investigation and implementation support.
Evidence standard: We report what was tested, what changed and whether the technical condition was resolved. Rankings and traffic are monitored, but they are not presented as guaranteed outcomes.
Jon works directly with the team, using its roles, documents and live challenges to make the material useful beyond the workshop.
The aim is not tool excitement. It is a shared method people can repeat, review and improve once they are back at work.
The exact examples change by team, but the programme is grounded in the following practical areas.
Crawl paths, robots directives, canonicals, sitemaps, duplicate URLs and index coverage are checked together, then translated into a prioritised repair plan.
We test what search engines can render, how internal links are exposed and whether key content depends on client-side behaviour.
Important services, topics and entities are connected through a structure that supports users, search engines and AI answer systems.
Templates are assessed against loading, interaction and layout stability data. Recommendations identify the code, media or third-party cause.
Schema is used to clarify genuine organisations, people, services, articles and relationships. It is never used to manufacture claims.
URL mapping, redirects, canonical rules, pre-launch checks and post-launch monitoring help protect established search demand.
Where relevant, we review location architecture, hreflang, business details and the consistency between local landing pages and real delivery.
We assess whether priority pages provide direct answers, clear sourcing, identifiable expertise and passages that can be understood and cited.
We record current URLs, search demand, indexation, backlinks and conversion paths before recommending a structural change.
Crawling, rendered-page checks, Search Console evidence and template inspection identify the actual failure rather than relying on a generic score.
Recommendations are grouped by likely impact, implementation effort, affected templates and risk to existing rankings.
Where access allows, we make the changes. Otherwise, we provide developer-ready instructions and re-test the result after release.
Read before you decide
A practical checklist for crawlability, indexation, rendering, architecture, structured data and migration risk.
Read the practical guideNeed ongoing learning rather than a private team engagement? Explore Jon’s AI Essentials learning pathway in a new tab.
Technical SEO services improve how a website is crawled, rendered, indexed and understood. They cover architecture, canonicals, redirects, sitemaps, performance, JavaScript, structured data and migration controls.
Yes, but it is one part of the work. AI systems still need accessible pages, clear entities, reliable source material and passages that answer a question directly. Technical access cannot compensate for weak or unsupported content.
It can. The scope should state whether the engagement is diagnosis only, developer support or direct implementation. Indexify can work in the codebase where access and release controls permit it.
We preserve the URL and query baseline, map every material change, test redirects and canonicals, compare staging with production and monitor indexation after release. No migration is risk free, but controlled evidence reduces avoidable loss.
A useful audit covers crawlability, indexation, rendering, canonicalisation, duplication, site architecture, internal links, sitemaps, structured data, performance and the templates responsible for repeated issues.
There is no reliable fixed timeframe. Search engines must recrawl and reprocess the affected pages, and rankings also depend on relevance, authority and competition. We measure whether the technical problem was resolved before attributing a ranking change.
Build the team’s ability to diagnose, brief and measure technical and content work.
Explore this serviceCreate a reliable measurement layer for search visibility, journeys and enquiries.
Explore this serviceTurn qualified search visits into clearer and easier next steps.
Explore this serviceTell us about the team, the workflow and what has prompted the conversation. We will recommend a proportionate first step.
Start the conversation