Focused diagnosis
Best for
One known indexation, rendering or performance issue.
Typical output
Reproduction steps, cause, fix and acceptance criteria.
Find and fix the technical conditions that prevent important pages from being crawled, understood and surfaced. We protect established URLs while improving the foundations for Google Search, AI Overviews and answer engines.
The scope is agreed around the problem and the evidence required. You do not need to commit to a larger engagement before a focused diagnostic has earned it.
Best for
One known indexation, rendering or performance issue.
Typical output
Reproduction steps, cause, fix and acceptance criteria.
Best for
A site with uncertain priorities or declining search performance.
Typical output
Prioritised findings by template, impact and implementation effort.
Best for
A redesign, replatform or domain change.
Typical output
Baseline, URL mapping, staging review and launch monitoring.
Best for
Teams shipping regular site changes.
Typical output
Release checks, issue investigation and implementation support.
Evidence standard: We report what was tested, what changed and whether the technical condition was resolved. Rankings and traffic are monitored, but they are not presented as guaranteed outcomes.
Jon scopes the work and does it. His background spans software development, statistical analysis and marketing intelligence, so the person who finds the problem is also the person who can fix it.
There is no hand-off between sales, strategy and delivery. You deal with Jon from the first conversation to the final check.
The scope follows your site and the problem you need to solve. These are the areas the work usually covers.
Crawl paths, robots directives, canonicals, sitemaps, duplicate URLs and index coverage are checked together, then translated into a prioritised repair plan.
We test what search engines can render, how internal links are exposed and whether key content depends on client-side behaviour.
Important services, topics and entities are connected through a structure that supports users, search engines and AI answer systems.
Templates are assessed against loading, interaction and layout stability data. Recommendations identify the code, media or third-party cause.
Schema is used to clarify genuine organisations, people, services, articles and relationships. It is never used to manufacture claims.
URL mapping, redirects, canonical rules, pre-launch checks and post-launch monitoring help protect established search demand.
Where relevant, we review location architecture, hreflang, business details and the consistency between local landing pages and real delivery.
We assess whether priority pages provide direct answers, clear sourcing, identifiable expertise and passages that can be understood and cited.
Real record from our own website, September 2026
A missing page should return a clear “not found”. On our own site it did not, and the first fix did not hold. This is the record of finding out why.
Evidence
A request for a URL that did not exist was redirected to itself, again and again, until the browser gave up. Search engines treat that as an error, and a visitor sees a broken site where a helpful page should be.
Cause
A rule meant to remove trailing slashes matched every missing URL, because the host ignores the trailing slash when it matches rules. Removing it did not work at first: a generated configuration file, committed by mistake, still held the old rule.
Fix
The rule was removed, the generated file was taken out of the repository and a proper “not found” page was added. The host already removes trailing slashes from real pages on its own.
Check
A missing URL now returns 404 with the “not found” page. A real page requested with a trailing slash returns one 301 to the clean URL. Both were checked again on 30 September 2026.
What this does and does not show. It shows the method: reproduce the fault, find the cause, make the smallest change and verify it on the live site. It is our own site, so it is not a client result, and no ranking or traffic change is claimed from it.
We record current URLs, search demand, indexation, backlinks and conversion paths before recommending a structural change.
Crawling, rendered-page checks, Search Console evidence and template inspection identify the actual failure rather than relying on a generic score.
Recommendations are grouped by likely impact, implementation effort, affected templates and risk to existing rankings.
Where access allows, we make the changes. Otherwise, we provide developer-ready instructions and re-test the result after release.
Read before you decide
A practical checklist for crawlability, indexation, rendering, architecture, structured data and migration risk.
Read the practical guidePublished prices, so you know what you would pay before you get in touch. The fixes are done for you on the live site, not left in a report.
£900 a month
plus VAT
£1,750 a month
plus VAT
£2,500–£3,500 a month
plus VAT
New retainers start with a £2,500 onboarding sprint that clears the backlog in the first month. We waive it if you commit to six months.
Want a one-off first? A standalone technical audit starts from £1,500 and ends with a prioritised fix list your developer can act on.
All prices exclude VAT. See every published price or see how SEO and AI search works.
Technical SEO services improve how a website is crawled, rendered, indexed and understood. They cover architecture, canonicals, redirects, sitemaps, performance, JavaScript, structured data and migration controls.
Yes, but it is one part of the work. AI systems still need accessible pages, clear entities, reliable source material and passages that answer a question directly. Technical access cannot compensate for weak or unsupported content.
It can. The scope should state whether the engagement is diagnosis only, developer support or direct implementation. Indexify can work in the codebase where access and release controls permit it.
We preserve the URL and query baseline, map every material change, test redirects and canonicals, compare staging with production and monitor indexation after release. No migration is risk free, but controlled evidence reduces avoidable loss.
A useful audit covers crawlability, indexation, rendering, canonicalisation, duplication, site architecture, internal links, sitemaps, structured data, performance and the templates responsible for repeated issues.
A standalone technical audit starts from £1,500 plus VAT and ends with a prioritised fix list. If you want the fixes done for you, our SEO and AI search retainer is £1,750 a month plus VAT, with a three-month minimum. It starts with a £2,500 onboarding sprint, which we waive on a six-month commitment. Smaller sites can start with Growth Partner at £900 a month, and larger or ecommerce sites are usually £2,500 to £3,500 a month.
There is no reliable fixed timeframe. Search engines must recrawl and reprocess the affected pages, and rankings also depend on relevance, authority and competition. We measure whether the technical problem was resolved before attributing a ranking change.
“Jon has provided excellent support for SEO strategy and implementation for Avicenna Pharmacies across England and Wales, driving impactful results for our brand awareness campaigns. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved top 5 rankings in a remarkably short time. Jon delivered a detailed, structured roadmap with clear tracking metrics, making progress transparent and actionable.”
“Our website had been facing some serious technical issues on WordPress and a noticeable drop in SEO rankings, and Jon was incredibly helpful in diagnosing and resolving these problems. He didn’t just fix the immediate problems; he also offered valuable advice on optimizing our site for better search engine visibility in the future.”
“Jon and the team were able to offer us clear, concise and accurate support and information during an integral business move when merging our company websites. The team are able to give strategic direction and reliable information at the drop of a hat! Incredibly responsive, could not recommend their services more.”
“Thanks to his expertise and unwavering dedication, we’ve catapulted to the first page of Google for our targeted keywords. What truly distinguishes Indexify is their exceptional customer service. Jon is incredibly responsive and attentive to our needs, ensuring that every question or concern is promptly addressed.”
Audit and implementation support for Manchester businesses and agency teams.
Explore this serviceWork directly with a technical SEO practitioner on diagnosis and delivery.
Explore this serviceBuild the team’s ability to diagnose, brief and measure technical and content work.
Explore this serviceCreate a reliable measurement layer for search visibility, journeys and enquiries.
Explore this serviceTurn qualified search visits into clearer and easier next steps.
Explore this serviceTell us about the problem and what has prompted the conversation. Jon replies personally and will recommend a proportionate first step.