Journey health check
Best for
A form, checkout or page that may be failing.
Typical output
Cross-device test evidence and prioritised fixes.
Find where suitable visitors lose confidence, encounter friction or fail to complete the journey. Then improve the page, form or process without putting established search visibility at risk.
The scope is agreed around the workflow, people, systems and evidence required. You do not need to commit to a large programme before a focused diagnostic or pilot has earned it.
Best for
A form, checkout or page that may be failing.
Typical output
Cross-device test evidence and prioritised fixes.
Best for
A wider journey with unclear drop-off causes.
Typical output
Evidence map, friction analysis and opportunity backlog.
Best for
A high-value question with sufficient traffic.
Typical output
Hypothesis, variants, measurement and result record.
Best for
Teams able to implement and learn continuously.
Typical output
Research, testing, release and learning cycle.
Evidence standard: We do not publish anonymous percentage uplifts without the underlying permission and evidence. Results are assessed against the agreed commercial and quality measures.
Jon works directly with the team, using its roles, documents and live challenges to make the material useful beyond the workshop.
The aim is not tool excitement. It is a shared method people can repeat, review and improve once they are back at work.
The exact examples change by team, but the programme is grounded in the following practical areas.
We map the route from landing page to enquiry or purchase, checking message continuity, decision points, technical failures and avoidable friction.
GA4, form records, search data, heatmaps, session recordings and customer feedback are used according to the question each source can answer.
We clarify who a page is for, what is being offered, what evidence supports it and what the visitor should do next.
Fields, validation, errors, mobile behaviour, trust signals and notification flows are tested as one complete journey.
Test ideas are prioritised by evidence, value, risk and traffic. The success measure and stopping rule are set before the result is seen.
Winning or clearly useful changes are implemented, validated and recorded so the team keeps the learning rather than just the final variant.
We record the current journey, conversion definition, traffic mix and known technical constraints before changing a high-value page.
Quantitative and qualitative evidence is used to identify where people hesitate, fail or arrive with the wrong expectation.
We write and design a proportionate intervention, then use a controlled test or carefully measured release where traffic is limited.
We check the implemented journey, compare the agreed measure and document what the result does and does not prove.
Need ongoing learning rather than a private team engagement? Explore Jon’s AI Essentials learning pathway in a new tab.
Conversion rate optimisation is the evidence-led process of improving the proportion of suitable visitors who complete a useful action. It combines analytics, research, copy, design, technical checks and controlled experimentation.
Yes, a controlled split test needs enough eligible users and conversions to answer the question in a reasonable period. Lower-traffic sites can still improve through journey testing, customer research, technical fixes and measured releases.
It can if a test hides useful content, changes indexable URLs or serves search engines a different experience. We protect canonical content, rendering, internal links and performance when designing experiments.
The right measures may include qualified enquiries, revenue per visitor, completion errors, lead quality, time to respond and downstream sales. A higher form completion rate is not useful if it creates worse leads.
Yes. We test the visible experience, validation, submission, stored record, analytics event, thank-you state and notification. This often reveals operational failures that page analytics alone misses.
Agree the valuable action and inspect the complete journey. This prevents the project from optimising a cosmetic metric or a page that is not the real source of lost enquiries.
Repair the event, lead and journey evidence needed for reliable optimisation.
Explore this serviceProtect rendering, performance and indexation while changing important pages.
Explore this serviceImprove internal workflows and decision processes around the customer journey.
Explore this serviceTell us about the team, the workflow and what has prompted the conversation. We will recommend a proportionate first step.
Start the conversation