AI readiness assessment

Find out whether AI is worth applying here, before you commission a build.

A structured assessment of your processes, data, capability and governance position, scored against a method you keep and can re-run. The output is a decision you can defend, including the decision not to proceed.

Before the first pilot

What is ready, and what needs a decision?

Tick only the conditions you can evidence today. A missing condition is a next action, not a verdict on your team.

Before the first pilot controls

Your choices stay in this page. No sign-up required.

01Owner02Data03Test04Decision

0 of 4 pilot conditions evidenced

Name an owner and define the problem. Agree suitable test data and access. Measure the baseline and write an acceptance test. Assign review and document the fallback.

A checklist cannot verify security, legal suitability, data quality or commercial value. Bring the underlying evidence to the review.

Assumptions and how to use this tool

This is a preparation checklist, not the scored Indexify readiness audit, certification or compliance advice.

Working method

From uncertainty to a decision you can defend

Map the work, test it against real constraints, score what survives, then commit only to the smallest pilot that can produce evidence. 01 Map 02 Constrain 03 Score 04 Decide evidence review
Map the work, test it against real constraints, score what survives, then commit only to the smallest pilot that can produce evidence.
Engagement options

Start at the smallest level that can answer the decision

The scope is agreed around the problem and the evidence required. You do not need to commit to a larger engagement before a focused diagnostic has earned it.

Single-team assessment

Best for

One department with a clear repeated workflow and a decision to make.

Typical output

Scorecard, use-case register and a named first pilot. From £3,000 excluding VAT.

Readiness plus AI visibility

Best for

Organisations that also need to know how AI assistants currently represent them.

Typical output

The above, plus an AI visibility baseline and a source-authority plan. From £4,500 excluding VAT.

Multi-team assessment

Best for

Several functions where the priority between them is genuinely unclear.

Typical output

Comparative scoring across teams, plus a sequenced roadmap. From £5,500 excluding VAT.

Regulated or sensitive-data assessment

Best for

Organisations where confidentiality or regulatory exposure drives the answer.

Typical output

The above, plus a constraints register and a governance requirement set. From £7,500 excluding VAT.

Evidence standard: The fee is fixed and agreed in writing before the work starts. Every scored opportunity is tied to a named process, a named owner and a measure that would show whether it worked. Where the honest answer is that the data, the ownership or the capability is not yet in place, the report says so rather than recommending a pilot that cannot succeed.

Jon Goodey, founder of Indexify
Who does the work

Jon Goodey, founder of Indexify

Jon scopes the work and does it. His background spans software development, statistical analysis and marketing intelligence, so the person who finds the problem is also the person who can fix it.

There is no hand-off between sales, strategy and delivery. You deal with Jon from the first conversation to the final check.

Read Jon’s full profile
Scope

What the work covers

The scope follows your organisation and the problem you need to solve. These are the areas the work usually covers.

01

Process and opportunity mapping

Interviews and workflow review across the teams that carry the repeated work.

  • Repeated tasks, documents, decisions and handovers
  • Current tools, accounts and licence position
  • Where delay, rework and inconsistency actually occur
02

Data and confidentiality review

What the organisation holds, who may use it and under what conditions.

  • Data quality, location, ownership and access
  • Personal, regulated and commercially sensitive material
  • Retention, residency and third-party processing constraints
03

Capability and adoption assessment

Whether the people involved can carry the change once the tooling exists.

  • Current confidence and practice by role
  • Named owners, reviewers and escalation routes
  • Realistic barriers to adoption in this organisation
04

AI visibility position

How the organisation is currently described, cited or omitted by AI assistants.

  • Whether assistants can find and correctly describe you
  • Which sources they draw on when they do
  • Where competitors are cited and you are not

How the engagement works

  1. 1

    Scope and access

    Agree the teams, processes and systems in scope, and what evidence can be shared.

  2. 2

    Interviews and review

    Structured conversations with the people doing the work, alongside a review of documents, tools and data.

  3. 3

    Scoring and prioritisation

    Score each candidate opportunity against value, feasibility, risk and adoption effort using a method you keep.

  4. 4

    Report and decision session

    A written assessment and a working session where the leadership team chooses the first pilot, or decides not to proceed.

What you take away

  • Written AI readiness assessment with a scorecard you can re-run later
  • Prioritised use-case register with value, feasibility, risk and adoption scoring
  • Data, confidentiality and governance constraints register
  • AI visibility baseline showing how assistants currently describe the organisation
  • 90-day roadmap with named owners and decision points
  • Scope for a first pilot, including the measure that would justify continuing

Read before you decide

What does UK AI consultancy actually cost?

A sourced benchmark of published UK AI consultancy, readiness and implementation pricing, including which providers publish figures and which do not.

Read the practical guide

Questions buyers ask

What is an AI readiness audit?

A structured assessment of whether an organisation can apply AI to its real work safely and usefully. It covers the processes that could benefit, the data and confidentiality constraints that limit what is possible, the capability of the people involved, and the governance needed before anything is deployed. The output is a decision, not a demonstration.

How much does an AI readiness assessment cost?

Ours start at £3,000 excluding VAT for a single team, rising to £7,500 for regulated or sensitive-data work, and the full breakdown is on our pricing page. Across the wider UK market, published fixed-fee assessments run from around £1,000 for a single department to £8,000 for organisation-wide work, while several suppliers on the Government G-Cloud framework price readiness by the day instead. Our sourced benchmark sets out those figures with the caveats each one carries.

How is this different from an AI strategy workshop?

A workshop generates ideas and shared understanding in a room. A readiness audit tests those ideas against the organisation’s actual data, constraints, capability and governance position, and scores them. A workshop is a good way to start when nobody agrees on the problem. An audit is what you need before committing budget.

What if the assessment says we are not ready?

That is a legitimate and useful result. It is considerably cheaper to learn that the data is not in a usable state, or that no owner exists for the workflow, before commissioning a build rather than during one. The report will name what would need to change first.

Why does an AI readiness audit look at AI search visibility?

Because AI assistants are increasingly how buyers, candidates and journalists first encounter an organisation. If assistants cannot find you, describe you incorrectly, or cite a competitor in your place, that is a commercial exposure created by AI whether or not you ever deploy it internally. Most readiness assessments do not look at it at all.

Who needs to be involved?

The people who actually do the repeated work, plus whoever owns the data and whoever can authorise a change to the process. Assessments that only involve leadership tend to produce a roadmap nobody can carry out.

Google reviews

What clients say about working with Indexify

5.0 from 6 Google reviews (opens in a new tab)
★★★★★
“Jon has provided excellent support for SEO strategy and implementation for Avicenna Pharmacies across England and Wales, driving impactful results for our brand awareness campaigns. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved top 5 rankings in a remarkably short time. Jon delivered a detailed, structured roadmap with clear tracking metrics, making progress transparent and actionable.”
Nida, Avicenna Pharmacies Review on Google, August 2025
★★★★★
“Our website had been facing some serious technical issues on WordPress and a noticeable drop in SEO rankings, and Jon was incredibly helpful in diagnosing and resolving these problems. He didn’t just fix the immediate problems; he also offered valuable advice on optimizing our site for better search engine visibility in the future.”
Francesca Ranauro Review on Google, January 2025
★★★★★
“Jon and the team were able to offer us clear, concise and accurate support and information during an integral business move when merging our company websites. The team are able to give strategic direction and reliable information at the drop of a hat! Incredibly responsive, could not recommend their services more.”
Emily Walker Review on Google, February 2024
★★★★★
“Thanks to his expertise and unwavering dedication, we’ve catapulted to the first page of Google for our targeted keywords. What truly distinguishes Indexify is their exceptional customer service. Jon is incredibly responsive and attentive to our needs, ensuring that every question or concern is promptly addressed.”
Carl Pike Review on Google, September 2023

Find out where AI is actually worth applying

Tell us about the problem and what has prompted the conversation. Jon replies personally and will recommend a proportionate first step.