Clicks are falling
You still show up in Google, but fewer people click through. We check what searchers see now, AI Overviews included, and improve the titles and pages that lose the click.
Find where suitable visitors lose confidence or fail to enquire. You work directly with Jon Goodey, who checks the journey, prioritises practical fixes and measures what changes.
Start with a conversion audit from £1,500 plus VAT. A/B testing comes in when your conversion volume can support it.
Conversion audit
From £1,500 one-off, plus VAT
Search brings people to your site. Conversion is what turns them into enquiries. We look at both for Manchester businesses: what people see in Google, where they land and where they leave. Then we fix whatever is costing you the most enquiries first.
You still show up in Google, but fewer people click through. We check what searchers see now, AI Overviews included, and improve the titles and pages that lose the click.
People arrive and leave without getting in touch. We find the page, form or step where they drop off and fix that first.
You have Search Console and analytics, but not a clear answer. We turn them into a short list of what to change and why.
Most of this work is for B2B and service businesses whose website should bring enquiries, and for shops that want more orders from the visitors they already have. Indexify is a founder-led consultancy, so it suits a business that wants one accountable person and not a large agency team.
Each item below is labelled for what it is. A review of SEO work is not a conversion result, and an example from our own site is not a client outcome.
Client reviews: SEO and technical work
Four clients have written about SEO strategy, technical fixes and a website merger. None of the reviews is about a conversion project, so read them as evidence of how Jon works, not of conversion results.
Read the reviewsPublished case: our own site
A dated account of what was found, what had been changed, how few clicks it brought and what cannot be claimed from it. It is search visibility evidence, not a conversion result.
Read the case studyIssue-to-fix record: our own site
A real fault on our own contact form, found on 30 September 2026: what the evidence was, what caused it, what changed and how it is checked.
See the recordWhat is missing. We have not yet published a named client conversion case study. We will not publish a client’s numbers without their approval, a dated baseline and a clear statement of what else could have caused the change. When one is approved it will appear here. See the standard a case study has to meet.
These are three different jobs. Which one you need depends on what you already know and how many conversions the page gets, not on how much you want to spend.
From £1,500 plus VAT, one-off
Use it when
You do not know why visitors are not enquiring, or you do not trust the numbers.
What you get
The tracking checked, the journey reviewed, the forms tested end to end and a prioritised list of fixes.
Book a conversion audit£1,750 a month plus VAT, three-month minimum
Use it when
The problems are known, or the audit has found them, and the page does not get enough conversions for a split test to finish in a sensible time.
What you get
Weekly fix sprints on the pages and forms that bring enquiries, each change checked before and after, with the limits of the comparison stated. This is the ongoing CRO fee, and SEO and AI search are included.
Start ongoing CROFrom £2,500 a month plus VAT
Use it when
The page gets enough conversions for a controlled test to reach an answer in weeks, and the question is worth that answer.
What you get
Test design, build, checks and analysis, with the sample size and stopping rule set before the test starts. Winning changes are rolled out for you.
Plan a testing programmeNot sure which applies? The decision aid further down estimates how long a test would take on your own numbers, and says so when the honest answer is that nobody can tell yet.
The audit is the diagnosis. It ends with a list you can act on, whether or not you carry on with us.
Whether the enquiries your analytics counts match the enquiries that actually arrived. Everything else depends on this.
What searchers see in Google before they click, which pages they land on and where they leave.
Forms, calls and buttons tested end to end on a phone and on a desktop, including what happens after the visitor presses send.
Each one with its evidence, its priority and the check that shows it worked, so you or your developer can act on it.
Sample format. The findings are invented
This shows the layout of the list you receive: what was found, the evidence, the priority, the change and the check. The four findings are invented to show the format. They are not from a client.
| Finding | Evidence | Priority | Change | How it is checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The enquiry form fails on phones | On a phone-sized screen the form shows no error and sends nothing. On a desktop it works. Analytics counts the button press either way. | 1: it blocks enquiries | Repair the validation and the submit step for small screens. | A test enquiry arrives from a phone and from a desktop, with one analytics event each. |
| The thank-you page counts twice | Reloading the confirmation page records a second conversion. Analytics shows more enquiries than the inbox holds. | 1: the numbers cannot be trusted | Record the conversion once for each enquiry sent. | Analytics and stored enquiries match for a full week. |
| The service page answers the wrong question | Search Console shows visitors arriving on price searches. The page gives no price or range. | 2: high traffic, small change | Add the fee and what it covers near the top of the page. | Enquiries per visit compared for the four weeks before and after, with anything else that changed written down. |
| The phone number cannot be tapped | On a phone the number is part of an image. Call tracking shows no calls from mobile visitors. | 2 | Replace the image with a tappable phone link. | Tapping the number starts a call on an iPhone and an Android phone, and calls appear in tracking. |
A real list is longer and refers to your own pages, screenshots and records. Priority follows the evidence: a fault that stops enquiries arriving comes before a wording change.
Real record from our own website, 30 September 2026
We audited our own contact form the way we would audit a client’s. The page looked right and the form worked. The fault was in what arrived afterwards.
Evidence
The contact page has a hidden field for the package a visitor chose. We read the field names on the most recent stored enquiries, and the list of fields the form host had registered: neither included it. Six service pages also linked to the form with a service name it did not list, so the form opened with nothing selected.
Cause
The form host builds its list of fields from a hidden copy of the form in the site template. That copy did not include the package field, so the value was dropped on arrival. The unlisted names came from pages written before the form’s options were settled.
Fix
The field was added to the registered form, every link now uses a name the form lists, and the form shows what you are enquiring about so a mismatch can be seen.
Check
The site build now stops if any link to the contact form names a service the form does not list, or if the form has a field the host has not been told about. The host’s form definition is read back after a release to confirm the field is registered.
What this does and does not show. It shows the method: evidence, cause, fix and check. It is our own site, so it is not a client result, and it does not show that enquiries went up. The field is now registered with the form host. A real enquiry carrying its service and package has not yet been followed through to the inbox, so that last check is still to do.
Jon scopes the work and does it. His background spans software development, statistical analysis and marketing intelligence, so the person who finds the problem is also the person who can fix it.
There is no hand-off between sales, strategy and delivery. If a job needs someone else, such as your own developer, the written scope says who does what.
Start with a one-off audit, or make CRO part of the monthly retainer alongside SEO and AI search.
From £1,500 one-off
plus VAT
£1,750 a month
plus VAT
From £2,500 a month
plus VAT
| Term | Conversion audit | Ongoing CRO | Testing programme |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fee | From £1,500 one-off, plus VAT | £1,750 a month, plus VAT | From £2,500 a month, plus VAT |
| Minimum term | None. It is a one-off fee | Three-month minimum | Agreed in the written scope |
| Onboarding fee | None | £2,500 onboarding sprint in the first month, waived on a six-month commitment | Agreed in the written scope |
| What the fee covers | Diagnosis: the tracking check, the journey review, the forms tested end to end and a prioritised list of fixes. | Weekly fix sprints on the pages and forms that bring enquiries, tracking kept accurate, plus SEO and AI search in the same fee. | Test design, build, checks and analysis, with winning changes rolled out for you. |
| Scoped separately | Making the fixes. That is done through the monthly retainer, or by your own developer working from the list. | Controlled A/B tests, which are scoped as a testing programme. | Sites without enough conversions to reach a result. Those start with the audit or ongoing CRO. |
Ongoing CRO is the same retainer as SEO and AI search, so the same terms apply: a three-month minimum and a £2,500 onboarding sprint, waived if you commit to six months.
The written scope names any testing, survey or session-recording software the work needs and who pays for it, before anything starts.
We confirm the scope and fee in writing before any work starts.
All prices exclude VAT. See every published price or see how SEO and AI search works.
Both are free, need no sign-up and keep your figures in the page. The first shows what an improvement would be worth if your assumptions held. The second estimates whether an A/B test could reach an answer on your numbers.
Scenario, not a forecast
Put in your own figures to see what a given improvement in conversion rate would mean in enquiries, qualified leads and money, if every other assumption held. It shows the size of the question. It cannot tell you what will happen.
To take the sums further, measure:
Read this first. The result is arithmetic on your assumptions. It is not a forecast, an Indexify result or a promise. It assumes lead quality and close rate stay the same, and they may not: a change that brings more enquiries can bring weaker ones.
Have the assumptions checked in a conversion auditA relative improvement of 20% on a 2% conversion rate takes it to 2.4%. That is a change of 0.4 percentage points, not 20 points. The two are often confused, and the difference is large.
2,000 eligible visitors at a 2% conversion rate is 40 enquiries a month. A 20% relative improvement would make that 48, which is 8 more. If half of those are a genuine fit, that is 4 extra qualified leads. If one in five becomes a customer, that is 0.8 of a sale a month. At £2,000 contribution per sale, the scenario is worth £1,600 a month.
Nobody measured these figures. They show the arithmetic, and the fractional sale is normal: it is an average over time, not a count.
Decision aid
An A/B test only helps if it can reach an answer in a sensible time. That depends on how many conversions you get, how big a change you need to detect and how long you can wait. Monthly traffic on its own does not decide it.
Enter the visitors and enquiries for the page you have in mind. If you do not know them, that is the answer for now: measure first.
A conversion audit starts with the tracking, so you leave with numbers you can rely on.
Ask about a conversion auditThe estimate is the standard sample-size calculation for comparing two conversion rates: a two-sided test at 5% significance with 80% power, and visitors split equally between two versions. Weeks are rounded up, because a test should run in whole weeks to cover weekdays and weekends alike.
It is a planning estimate. It does not allow for seasonality, several variants, or checking the result early, all of which make a test take longer or mean less.
A page with 2,000 visitors and 40 enquiries a month converts at 2%. To detect a 20% relative improvement, each version needs about 21,100 visitors, so 42,200 in all. At 2,000 a month that is around 92 weeks. A test is the wrong tool for that page today.
The same page with 60,000 visitors and 1,200 enquiries a month would reach the answer in about four weeks.
Conversion rate optimisation (CRO) is the work of getting more of the right visitors to your website to enquire or buy. It combines analytics, user research, clearer pages, working forms and, where the numbers allow, A/B testing. It is not the clinical research or chief revenue officer meaning of CRO.
Often, yes, but not through A/B testing. A page with a few hundred or a few thousand visitors a month rarely gets enough conversions for a split test to finish in a sensible time. The useful work there is testing the form, watching how people use the page, fixing what is broken or unclear, and measuring before and after with the limits stated. The decision aid on this page estimates how long a test would take on your own numbers.
There is no honest fixed timeframe. An audit tells you what is wrong, and the timetable for it is agreed in the written scope. How quickly a fix shows in your enquiries depends on how many enquiries you get: a page with 40 enquiries a month takes much longer to show a clear change than a page with 400. We say what the evidence shows and what it cannot show yet.
As long as the numbers require, which is worked out before the test starts. The length depends on your baseline conversion rate, the smallest improvement worth detecting and the share of traffic in the test. We fix the sample size and the stopping rule in advance and run in whole weeks. A test is not stopped early because it looks good. If the sums say a test would take many months, we use research-led fixes instead.
Qualified enquiries, not just form fills. A change that brings more enquiries but worse ones has not helped. Where your records allow, we follow enquiries through to whether they were a genuine fit and whether they became customers, and we check the form delivers every enquiry it counts.
Yes. The audit fee covers the diagnosis and the prioritised list of fixes. The fixes are then made through the monthly retainer, or by your own developer working from the list and its acceptance checks.
A conversion audit starts from £1,500 plus VAT as a one-off. Ongoing CRO is part of our SEO and AI search retainer at £1,750 a month plus VAT, with a three-month minimum and a £2,500 onboarding sprint that we waive on a six-month commitment. Testing programmes for sites with enough traffic start from £2,500 a month plus VAT. Prices are the same in Manchester as everywhere else, and we confirm the scope in writing before any work starts.
Indexify is a founder-led consultancy rather than a large agency. If you are comparing CRO agencies in Manchester, the difference is that Jon Goodey scopes the work, does it and reports on it himself. There is no account manager between you and the person making the changes.
Yes. Where Jon has access to the site he makes the agreed changes himself. Otherwise your developer receives each fix as a written ticket with the evidence, the change and the check that shows it worked, and Jon re-tests it after release.
It can if a change hides useful content, alters indexable URLs or shows search engines a different page. We protect the content, the URLs, the internal links and the page speed when changing a page that ranks.
Google Analytics 4 and Search Console for the numbers, your own form and CRM records for what actually arrived, and heatmaps or session recordings where they answer a specific question. For A/B tests we use the testing tool that suits your site. The written scope names any software the work needs and who pays for it.
Our Manchester address is Unit 16, Premier Park, Acheson Way, Trafford Park, Manchester, M17 1GA. Contact us to discuss the work and agree how it will be delivered.
These reviews are about SEO and technical work. They show how Jon works with clients. They are not conversion results.
“Jon has provided excellent support for SEO strategy and implementation for Avicenna Pharmacies across England and Wales, driving impactful results for our brand awareness campaigns. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved top 5 rankings in a remarkably short time. Jon delivered a detailed, structured roadmap with clear tracking metrics, making progress transparent and actionable.”
“Our website had been facing some serious technical issues on WordPress and a noticeable drop in SEO rankings, and Jon was incredibly helpful in diagnosing and resolving these problems. He didn’t just fix the immediate problems; he also offered valuable advice on optimizing our site for better search engine visibility in the future.”
“Jon and the team were able to offer us clear, concise and accurate support and information during an integral business move when merging our company websites. The team are able to give strategic direction and reliable information at the drop of a hat! Incredibly responsive, could not recommend their services more.”
“Thanks to his expertise and unwavering dedication, we’ve catapulted to the first page of Google for our targeted keywords. What truly distinguishes Indexify is their exceptional customer service. Jon is incredibly responsive and attentive to our needs, ensuring that every question or concern is promptly addressed.”
Tell Jon which page or form matters most and what prompted you to look. He replies personally and confirms the scope and fee in writing before any work starts.